Opportunity Home policy changes

Cruz expressed frustration over proposed Opportunity Home policies, noting that public housing was vital for her family's advancement and warning the new changes would prevent similar opportunities for others.

Representing the Historic Westside Association, Sanchez criticized Opportunity Home's proposed changes—including RAD conversions and ending payment agreements—as harmful safeguards that increase eviction risks.

Santibanez warned that RAD housing conversions risk demolishing affordable housing stock and displacing families, urging that public housing must remain public.

Speaking for the Coalition for Tenant Justice and Texas Housers, Galvan noted that canvassed residents were unaware of proposed MTW and RAD changes and urged the Commission to fight harder for public housing.

A public housing resident, Morales shared how public housing provided stability for her family and expressed worry that policy changes would jeopardize housing security and destabilize children.

Rico shared her personal history of experiencing homelessness after a childhood eviction from public housing, arguing that public housing tenants deserve better support and advocacy.

Mesa argued that Opportunity Home's MTW plan relies on measures like adding administrative fees to rent and eliminating repayment agreements, which increase eviction barriers for low-income residents.

A paralegal and homeless advocate, Molly criticized policies that force evictions over unpaid balances, arguing public housing should serve as a social service safety net rather than an opportunistic venture.

Representing the Coalition for Unified Housing and Historic Westside Resident Association, Herrera urged the Commission to push back against rules prohibiting door-knocking and informational flyers on properties.