We use cookies to understand how you use our site and improve your experience. You can choose which cookies to allow.
See our Privacy Policy and Terms.
San Antonio's getting serious about lawn care! If your grass gets too tall, you're looking at a $500 fine. So, keep those yards trimmed to avoid a costly ticket.
At a glance
Rising — being discussed more frequently. 5 mentions in the last 30 days, 6 the 60 before, 15 the 90 before that.
Property owners may face costs for repairs or demolition if the board orders action.
Neighbors benefit from improved safety and the removal of eyesores.
Property owners may be harmed by the costs of compliance.
The board is reviewing several properties that may be unsafe or in violation of city codes. These decisions help clean up neighborhoods and ensure buildings meet safety standards.
Addressing neglected and dilapidated residential buildings across the city to improve neighborhood conditions and enforce property maintenance codes.
The committee is reviewing how the city handles graffiti to keep neighborhoods clean and safe.
The city is working to improve how it handles dangerous properties, including better tracking of insurance, permits, and money owed to the city. The committee is pushing for faster timelines to keep neighborhoods safe.
The board is looking to hire a professional landscaping service to keep up properties owned by the agency. This ensures that the housing remains well-maintained and safe for the community.
A bird nest, a city fine and a federal law: San Antonio homeowner caught in the middle KSAT
The board is dealing with several homes that are falling apart and pose safety risks to neighbors and first responders. They are trying to decide when to force a demolition and when to give owners a chance to fix things up.
The city is moving to demolish several buildings that have been deemed unsafe. This is a safety measure to prevent accidents or further neighborhood blight.
Tornado rips off chunk of roof on North Side apartment building, forcing shutoff San Antonio Express-News
The board is reviewing several properties that may be unsafe or dilapidated. These cases are important because they address potential hazards in our neighborhoods.
The city is moving to address several properties that have been flagged as dangerous or dilapidated. This is about keeping neighborhoods safe and preventing hazards from abandoned or crumbling buildings.
The board is addressing properties that have become magnets for criminal activity, drug use, and squatting, posing risks to neighbors and first responders.
The board is addressing several properties that are falling apart and pose safety risks to the community.
The city is looking for better ways to deal with abandoned buildings that attract crime and lower property values. They are considering working with the county to speed up the process for dealing with properties that owe back taxes.
The city is cracking down on unsafe buildings that pose fire and safety risks to the community. These properties often lack basic structural integrity and are being cleared to prevent accidents.
Even if you haven’t received an appraisal notice, you can still file a protest with the county appraisal office.
The board is addressing properties that are either in emergency demolition situations or are considered dilapidated. This is to ensure public safety and maintain neighborhood standards.
Requests to allow auto repair shops with screened outside storage of vehicles and parts are being considered. This could support local businesses but raises questions about aesthetics and potential environmental impacts if not properly managed.
Tall grass in San Antonio could cost you up to $500. Here's why MySA
A briefing was provided on the city's electronic and paper citation processes.
The board debated the appropriateness of driveway materials and facade alterations, including the addition of a gable vent, balancing historical accuracy with modern needs and aesthetic improvements.
The board reviewed properties with dilapidated structures, determining whether they pose a public nuisance and require demolition or repair. This directly impacts neighborhood safety and property values.
Several property owners are appealing the revocation of their short-term rental permits due to unpaid hotel occupancy taxes. This raises questions about accountability, the role of management companies, and the process for ensuring tax compliance.
The meeting highlighted ongoing issues with property maintenance and code violations, particularly concerning vacant and neglected properties that can attract criminal activity.
Advocates highlighted the importance of investing in the repair and preservation of existing homes for low-income homeowners, emphasizing that this is crucial for preventing homelessness and maintaining community well-being.
The board is handling appeals related to the revocation of short-term rental permits, primarily due to issues with hotel occupancy tax (HOT) reporting and payments. These cases highlight the complexities of STR regulations, owner responsibilities, and the challenges in ensuring compliance.
A request for a five-foot fence was denied, with the board upholding the standard four-foot limit despite the applicant's security concerns. This highlights the tension between safety needs and historic district aesthetics.
A resident voiced concerns about eminent domain practices and the perceived lack of rights for landowners.
The board discussed legal matters concerning New Leaf Homes, LLC, specific properties, and vacant lots awarded to Terrafirma. This indicates ongoing legal oversight of development projects.
The board addressed several properties in severe disrepair, posing risks to public health and safety. These structures often attract illegal activity and can negatively impact surrounding neighborhoods.
The board is hearing appeals from individuals whose short-term rental permits were revoked, primarily due to issues with paying hotel occupancy taxes. This impacts property owners' ability to operate rentals and raises questions about city enforcement and communication.
The property at 5246 Village Crest is considered a dangerous building due to fire damage and structural instability. Demolition is being considered to mitigate risks to the community.
The council considered a zoning change to allow for the sale, service, or storage of manufactured homes and oversized vehicles. This decision impacts the land use and potential business operations in the area.
The commission reviews proposals for accessory structures like garages, ensuring they fit within the property and adhere to zoning and design standards. This impacts property owners' ability to utilize their land effectively.
Committee members raised concerns about difficulties in collecting owed fines, particularly for civil violations, and the challenges of enforcing court orders, especially for indigent defendants and unhoused individuals. This impacts the court's ability to ensure accountability.
The board heard an appeal regarding the revocation of a short-term rental permit due to unpaid taxes. This highlights issues with tax collection and permit enforcement.
The board addressed a case where significant exterior work was done without proper permits or certificates of appropriateness, highlighting issues with compliance and enforcement. This affects the integrity of the permitting process and the enforcement of historic district regulations.
The commission considered a request for a rear accessory structure, debating its design, visibility, and compatibility with the historic district, particularly concerning window styles and roof design.
At 2781 West Jett Road, the owner argued against demolition, citing legal precedents and the artistic value of his structures. This highlights the tension between enforcing building codes and respecting property owners' rights and creative endeavors.
Requests for variances on setbacks for accessory structures and fence heights were discussed. These decisions affect property use and aesthetics.
The board considers requests for extensions on repair timelines, balancing the need for property improvement with realistic completion schedules and the owner's ability to finance the work.
The board addressed properties in severe disrepair, posing risks to public safety and health. Decisions involved either ordering demolition or granting a limited time for repairs to bring structures up to code.
This project would significantly change the downtown landscape and commit city revenue to a major sports facility.
The board discussed the appeal of a revoked STR permit, with staff recommending denial.
The outcome of this variance request is pending further board action.
The board continued this item to a later date, after discussing requests to allow an ADU in the side yard and a minimal side setback.
We'll include it in your weekly brief whenever the council takes it up.
The weekly brief for San Antonio
Every council decision, in plain English — one email a week.
Join 1,130 residents following their cities
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.